I'm noticing a pattern

It's actually because lesbian love is masturbatory and juvenile. "Men are possessive" is bullshit because women too are possessive in straight relationships.

Is this going to be another one of those "woman divorced an abusive husband before becoming a lesbian so they're going to leave that out" things?

That doesn't explain why 54% of lesbian relationships suffer physical abuse.

divorce rates aren't directly comparable by themselves, you also need marriage rates
gay men are much less likely to get married

Women can only love themselves and their children. Everyone else is alien to them.

Lesbians tend to be as impulsive when marrying as straights, gays rarely marry ans when they do the relationship has been working out for a long time

They see their children as parts of themselves

Lesbians have the lowest rates of domestic violence, retard. You know this though.

Also, divorce isn’t a bad thing.

I was considering replying to that anon to ask if he was trying to summon lago.

They don’t. Lesbians in the CDC study were asked about lifetime prevalences of domestic violence. Some of those lesbians dated men before coming out. So the lesbian rate includes male aggressors.

When lesbians are removed, lesbians have the LOWEST rates of intimate partner violence among all women.

Bisexual women actually have the highest rates of IPV which no one ever mentions. 90% of their abusers are male.

divorce isn’t a bad thing

This is by far your all time worst take on any topic ever.
The entire point of marriage is to stay with someone until one or both of you die. They even make you explicitly declare you will do that as part of the ceremony. It's kind of insane divorce is even allowed given that fact, but so many people get marriage wrong that you need to provide a safe escape route for everyone so they don't all end up in weird abusive hostage situations.

She’s the most garbage trip in this site. Homophobic, Zionist, liberal, idiotic and proud of her ignorance.
Literally you state exactly why divorce is necessary and not inherently bad, lol. Plenty people get married for the legal benefits of having a spouse. It’s weird for you to want to enforce your personal ideas of marriage into others.

TRVTHNVKE

If it's just a tax benefit scam or a way to give someone citizenship to a country he or she wasn't born in I understand that and approve of it.
But most divorce is because of people just doing marriage wrong. They somehow recite the marriage vows saying in front of all their friends and family "to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better or for worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health, 'til death do us part," and then turn around and file for divorce because things got boring and they stopped having sex as often and being single again seemed like it would be more fun.
Should a person like that be put in prison? Probably not. Should a person like that be penalized in some other way instead of rewarded, like being ordered to pay a fine or placed on something similar to the sex offender list for people who lied with their wedding vows? I could probably feel OK with voting for a proposition along those lines were such a proposition to materialize.

retards

Bisexual women actually have the highest rates of IPV which no one ever mentions. 90% of their abusers are male.

Yet they choose to continue dating men way more often than they date women, and then wonder why so many lesbians don't trust them.

My hot take is that marriage shouldn't exist except as a contract on taking mutual responsibility for raising children. The tax/immigration shit can be sorted out with civil partnerships. But like the main negative consequence of divorce is that it fucks up the kids, and kids raised by single parents are undeniably worse off, so why not do away with the whole obsession with getting married as a life goal and just make it a strict requirement for having kids that automatically ends after the youngest hits 18.

Survivorship bias.
Gays don't "need" to marry, so the type of them that would get divorced simply don't enter marriage in the first place.
Meanwhile women want commitment so if you're dating one there's an expectation of tying the knot even if the couple isn't compatible.

If I had a gay husband I'd accuse him of cheating with a woman to see how they like it

2574865th thread posting same debunked meme stats

Why are (you) still on this board, anons?

Gays should play around (sex) with their gurl friends

Maybe 1% of all gays get married vs all lesbians marry on fist date. Are you stupid?

im happy to report that as a tranny I was a third to a lesbian marriage that ended up divorcing

Femoids are disloyal.

IIRC, bisexual men prefer to settle down with a male partner and bisexual women also prefer to settle down with a male partner. Given the choice, men and women would both rather be with a man.

Men are more willing to compromise, let small shit go, and are just generally easier to live with and get along with. It's the same reason girls end up hating their female roommates or why two girls are best friends one day and hate each other the next. Men also take relationships and commitment much more seriously, it's why women initiate the vast majority of divorces in hetero marriages.

You must be gay. All bisexual men would prefer to settle down with a woman. Men have so little to give offer. Only anus and poop sex.

All women are gynephilic also and would prefer a woman but are forced into comp het

Only if you include boomers essentially. The divorce rate is way lower now because less people are getting married.

Women have deeper, more emotionally fullfilling relationships than men have. Thats why men married to women are the happiest but women married to men are the unhappiest.

The more that stats about women come out the more I am conviced that female nature is more akin to that of a 6 year old kid given political power and its own agency or downright that of a parasitic organism and that women's suffrage was the single biggest mistake the world has ever done.

Stats about men murdering and raping does not shake you. Typical low iq moid

how many are bc one of them realizes she was straight all along

Not really because at least I know for a fucking fact that
a)it is the MINORITY of men doing this shit (around 5-6% if I recall)
and
b)if we...remove certain male "demographics" based on race those stats would be even lower
On the other hand the stats about women are universal and the MAJORITY of women do this shit. In short if we give power back to proper men and we remove it from the femishit,weak pussified system that is meant to make women feel more moral and better about themselves rather than give out justice and punishment to those who deserve it then even your OWN FUCKING FEMALE PROBLEMS would be largely solved.
Any other questions cupcake?

Men are evil and you just excuse their raping and murdering. Men would still be raping kids if women did not try to stop it with laws. Rape was legal in marriage few years past. Men do anything to not class rape as crime.

Most men are rapists. All men would rape if it was legal. Men make laws so that it is ok for men to suck baby penis while doing a divine "ritual", men make laws so that it is ok to marry little girls and rape them. All men are bad.

Men would still be raping kids if women did not try to stop it with laws. Rape was legal in marriage few years past. Men do anything to not class rape as crime.

It is not that men try to declassify rape it is that women try to classify EVERYTHING as rape because you know for a fucking fact that the only leverage against men is access to pussy so you politisized it. That won't work for you at least not forever because at some point you will have to stand on your merits as leaders in order to be trusted instead of using rape fear mongering and your pussy to clutch power. At some point men will stop giving a fuck and that is when you lose.
Also men are the ones protecting kids from you. Here is some shit none of you want to hear. The majority of child abuse is done by women,women systematically get charged less than men when it comes to pedophilia cases,women kill children and babies FAR more than men,and I am not even counting abortions here,and finally since we brought it up women want to act all innocent and moral when they created the ideology that calls babies parasites and dismembers them in the womb because "muh body muh choice mufucka".
So get off your moral high horse you are WORSE than men in the ways it socially counts for the rest of the world. A man rapes a woman and he gets put behind bars by other men where he gets even more punishement by the pond scum of men that already reside there. A woman kills 4 babies and ends 4 future citizens and 4 lifes and everyone applauds her as strong and independent. Whose actions do you think have far more lasting consequenses to the rest of the world.

I am not reading all that. Stop raping kids

So you just found a round about way to see the white nationalists viewpoint that jews,niggers and mudslimes are cockroaches incompatible with our western virtues. Congratulations we agree on something at least.

All you listed are men. Its not women making those things ok. All religions are written by males to justify rape

Refer back to this post.
and specifically to the

if we...remove certain male "demographics" based on race those stats would be even lower

part.
so let men ask you this. If we removed kikes,groids and mudslimes how much rape do you think would be happening by white,asian men,and to a lesser extend hispanic men?

but women married to men are the unhappiest

lol wrong. Single women are happier when they're younger because they still get unlimited sex and attention, and in the back of her mind she knows she can get married if she wants to.
But women who wait too long are absolutely fucking miserable. When women are still single at 30-35 they start having breakdowns.

Feminism is wrong when it says women were "oppressed." Women were just treated like children. We would never say that children are "oppressed" today. Women were treated like children which had some disadvantages but also advantages. The fact that women aren't logical enough to understand that or even have a real conversation about it kinda reinforces the view that maybe our ancestors were right to treat them like children

White men sailed to america and to asia to rape. All black in usa are biracial cause white men raped slave girls. White men are the worst rapist

Average woman is smarter than average man. You meet dangerous low iq males everyday when you go out. Men should not have any freedom until they are 35 years olds.

White men sailed to america and to asia to rape

You put way too much weight on the worth of your pussy. Men (and not just white men) sailed and colonised new places to expand their territory for more tangible resources. Whether that be more farmland,valuables such as gold,trade routes and what not is another debate in onitself. If you think that a bunch of men got unto ships with the sole thought of
"hey fellas the pussy back home is getting stale lets go find new fresh pussy in new lands to rape"
your worldview is laughably fucking deranged.

You meet dangerous low iq males everyday when you go out

therefore the average IQ is lower

women being unable to understand what a bell curve is is further evidence that you are children. In fact Larry Summers the President of Harvard brought up pic-related in a meeting once and female professors had a childish tantrum over it. They couldn't even try to debate it, they had to storm out of the room and cry because they are children.

Well, it's simple. Men are just easier to satisfy. A high of % gay marriages or relationships are open.

Specifically, some research indicates that between 30-50% of gay male couples are in open relationships whereas the number is like 3-5% for lesbians. Men don't really that much about true love or bonding, as long as they can coom, this make their mutual relationships more stable.

Im not a woman. Aggressive low iq males are everywhere..men should not have full rights until they are 35. They are dangerous

Average woman is smarter than average man

Average man and average women are the exact same in terms of intelligence. What you are thinking of is the outliers from the averages. More men are outside the average of their sex meaning that there are more low IQ men than there are low IQ womena but at the same time there are more high IQ men than there are high IQ women. Women are just there...in the middle...doing fuck all other than crying about rape.

Only if they're gay

IIRC, bisexual men prefer to settle down with a male partner

literally what is your source

Women cry about rape cause that all that men do. They excuse it everyday. Childporn would still be ok if it was not for women.

Men don't really that much about true love or bonding, as long as they can coom

/thread

Source is gay delusion

femboys are basically women and should be treated as such. Your replies ITT confirm that you do not have the brain of a fully-developed adult and aren't capable of having adult conversations. You are stuck in "teenage shitposter" mental level and will never progress beyond that.

Women cry about rape cause that all that men do

Nah women cry about rape because that is the ONLY crime that affects them more than men. In their fucktarded justice totem pole having peepee in vagigy without hand written contractual consent is a worse crime than the removal of life. To women rape accusations is a political tool nothing more nothing less and as such since their underdeveloped toddler like foid brains cannot keep a semblance of balance and justice for the whole than they shouldn't be allowed to vote and make decisions for the said whole. Simple as.

The truth is being a ciswoman is just harder than being a man.
Our brains are literally a circus of hormonal madness, our cycle being up and down, being prone to neuroticism and anxiety.
Men are MUCH more stable biologically speaking. We have like 1 week in the month where we feel stable and good like men always feel, every other week some shit is going down.

So men just live on mental easy mode compared to biological woman and they can just be like "chill itz not that deep :'D" as long as they can jerk their dicks.
As seen here as soon as men date each other they open their relationships and just start fucking everyone this would be unacceptable to most women because we simply have more depth and turmoil to us than just coom.

Why are you so pro rape, moid

"pro rape"

At what point did I say rape was NOT a crime child murdering foid?

Men are more emotional than women. Anger is emotion. If you look at our world leaders, they are all emotional immature men

They literally lack in all other emotions, so they aren't.

this would be unacceptable to most women because we simply have more depth and turmoil to us than just coom.

The greatest philosophers and scientic pioneers in history have been men by a staggering amount and lack of emotional control and mental instability is not depth foid. It is just weakness parading itself as some sort of virtue.

Men murder more children than women. More small children might be murdered by their mothers but thats only cause men don't spend any time with their kids, unless it is to rape them. Men just kinda suck

Men are too emotional

men call women retarded and don't allow them to get an education or get heard for 99% of history

UMM WOMEN WEREN'T DEEP THINKERS LIKE US!

My god you fucking retard.

Men forced women to be sex slaves and have no education. More proof of the horrible nature that men have.

Men murder more children than women.

Patendly wrong.

More small children might be murdered by their mothers but thats only cause men don't spend any time with their kids, unless it is to rape them

Ahhhh so even when women are wrong they STILL aren't wrong. Also funny how you admitted that children's lifes need to be protected by their fathers against their mothers putting the usual laughable rape trite aside at least there is SOME part of you that recognizes that women are more dangerous to kids than men.

FYI, 40% of rapists are women. What happened is that feminists are in charge of all the rape studies so feminists decided to just not include women raping men, that's why all the statistics you see are like "99% of rapists are men"
But if you include women raping men then 40% of rapists are women.

You could give this scenario to everyone in the world and BOTH men and women would go into the female only world. This alone tells you that no matter how you wanna talk shit on women, at the end of the day almost everyone prefers them.

A) First world, everyone is a cisman (besides you - you remain whatever sex you are)
B) Second world, everyone is a ciswoman (besides you - you remain whatever sex you are)

In both worlds, babies are made with technology, but they all remain the same sex that the world has.

ALMOST EVERY FUCKING PERSON WOULD GO INTO THE FEMALE ONLY WORLD
maybe some gay guys (but even those would be in danger by insane homophobes) or a few straight men would go into the male only world but 90% would go into the woman world

women are objectively the safer and better option
if you deny this you're in full cope mode

Men don't spend any time with their small kids so of course the only one who has a change to murder them is a woman. Men are out there raping women and waiting for their little girls to reach age where they can rape and murder them

more than 90% of all rapes are done by men

For the majority of history most men didn't have education either because they were working class peasants and slaves. In fact noblewomen were far better educated and lives far better than worling class men and they still were mental dog water when compared to said men. Your copout of

women didn't have access to education

is patently false. They had the same access to education as their male counterparts when accounting for social class and they still did fuck all with it other than cry rape at every mishap in their pathetic lifes. Women are inferior as a group and they had plenty of time to prove it. Deal with it.

So when I reply to a tweet stating how I'm a gay guy with a history of 0% DV or any crime for that matter and women don't want anything to do with me but they at least some would prefer the andrew tates of the world, I have been vindicated once again. Thanks for your assessment and OP rates of divorce rates based on gender.

It appears that the math used to derive an estimated percentage of female rapists that you found at the various websites you forwarded to us is flawed. First, we will summarize the assertion and what we perceive to be the basis for the assertion. According to the web links, the “40% of rapists were women” was derived from these two steps:

1) Combining the estimated number of female rape victims with the estimated number of being-made-to-penetrate male victims in the 12 months prior to the survey to conclude that about 50% of the rape or being-made-to-penetrate victims were males;

2) Multiplying the estimated percentage (79%) of male being-made-to-penetrate victims who reported having had female perpetrators in these victims’ lifetime with the 50% obtained in step 1 to claim that 40% of perpetrators of rape or being-made-to-penetrate were women.

None of these calculations should be used nor can these conclusions be correctly drawn from these calculations. To explain, in NISVS we define rape as “any completed or attempted unwanted vaginal (for women), oral, or anal penetration through the use of physical force (such as being pinned or held down, or by the use of violence) or threats to physically harm and includes times when the victim was drunk, high, drugged, or passed out and unable to consent.” We defined sexual violence other than rape to include being made to penetrate someone else, sexual coercion, unwanted sexual contact, and non-contact unwanted sexual experiences. Made to penetrate is defined as including “times when the victim was made to, or there was an attempt to make them, sexually penetrate someone without the victim’s consent because the victim was physically forced (such as being pinned or held down, or by the use of violence) or threatened with physical harm, or when the victim was drunk, high, drugged, or passed out and unable to consent.”

Feminists are not in charge of any stats in my conservative country and men do pretty much all rapes

We received a similar request to your recent inquiry and when reviewing our response realized we provided you some incorrect information in Section A. Here is the correction and we also included some additional information to help further clarify our points.

Regarding the specific assertion in question, several aspects of mistreatments of the data and the published estimates occurred in the above derivation:

A. While the percentage of female rape victims and the percentage of male being-made-to-penetrate victims were inferred from the past 12-month estimates by combining two forms of violence, the percentage of perpetrator by sex was taken from reported estimates for males for lifetime (a misuse of the percentage of male victims who reported only female perpetrators in their lifetime being made to penetrate victimization). This mismatch of timeframes is incorrect because the past 12-month victimization cannot be stretched to equate with lifetime victimization. In fact, Table 2.1 and 2.2 of the NISVS 2010 Summary Report clearly report that lifetime rape victimization of females (estimated at 21,840,000) is about 4 times the number of lifetime being made-to-penetrate of males (estimated at 5,451,000). [Emphasis added]

You didn't even read what I posted. That statistic comes from feminists who believe that a woman forcing a man to have sex is not raping him so they don't count that. But if you did include women raping men, then 60% of rapes are done by men and 40% by women.

D. As the study population is U.S. adults in non-institutional settings, the sample was designed to be representative of the study population, not the perpetrator population (therefore no sampling or weighting is done for the undefined universe of perpetrators). Hence, while the data can be analyzed to make statistical inferences about the victimization of U.S. adults residing in non-institutional settings, the NISVS data are incapable of lending support to any national estimates of the perpetrator population, let alone estimates of perpetrators of a specific form of violence (say, rape or being-made-to-penetrate).

E. Combining the estimated past 12-month female rape victims with the estimated past 12-month being-made-to-penetrate male victims cannot give an accurate number of all victims who were either raped or being-made-to-penetrate, even if this combination is consistent with CDC’s definition. Besides a disagreement with the definitions of the various forms of violence given in the NISVS 2010 Summary Report, this approach of combining the 12-month estimated number of female rape victims with the 12-month estimated number of male victims misses victims in the cells where reliable estimates were not reported due to small cell counts failing to meet statistical reliability criteria. For any combined form of violence, the correct analytical approach for obtaining a national estimate is to start at the raw data level of analysis, if such a creation of a combined construct is established.

We hope that this explanation is helpful and addresses your questions. Thank you for your interest in NISVS.

The NISVS Team

then 60% of rapes are done by men and 40% by women.

Already debunked with your own source

you actually have to be a troll or argue in bad faith if you want to genuinely argue 40% of rapes are committed by women LMAOOOOOOO

Men were not denied education based on their sex
Funny thing is that at one point women could earn some money with painting but men made it illegal women to sell their art. Men truly are the worst.

None of these calculations should be used nor can these conclusions be correctly drawn from these calculations

it's not an exact figure because feminists won't do this specific research, however it is the best we have and is far more accurate than saying >90% of rapists are men. And the margin of error could be in either direction, so it would be about 40% and might be slightly more or less, but would be close to 40 either way.

To explain, in NISVS we define rape as “any completed or attempted unwanted vaginal (for women), oral, or anal penetration through the use of physical force (such as being pinned or held down, or by the use of violence) or threats to physically harm and includes times when the victim was drunk, high, drugged, or passed out and unable to consent.” We defined sexual violence other than rape to include being made to penetrate someone else, sexual coercion, unwanted sexual contact, and non-contact unwanted sexual experiences. Made to penetrate is defined as including “times when the victim was made to, or there was an attempt to make them, sexually penetrate someone without the victim’s consent because the victim was physically forced (such as being pinned or held down, or by the use of violence) or threatened with physical harm, or when the victim was drunk, high, drugged, or passed out and unable to consent.”

...no shit? What's the point of posting this wall of text? That information was already included in

Lmao almost anyone with two braincelss to rub together would choose the cism only world because they would know alocation of labour would be done properly the labour itself would bedone properly and the techonologies that would run and sustain such a world would be maintained properly and even improved upon while the cisf world would crumble to dust withing a few generations due to lack of progress and inability of women to do hard labour.
Besides when foids are removed from the equation men are far more peaceful and agreeable with each other. Even for straight men we could create Vi powered gynoids that would blow cis foids out of the water in every conceivable way.

Women outperform men in all aspects of life now that they are given a change. Men only did better in past because of brute force and dei policies that favored them over anyone else. Trump and maga is just one big dei for men, cause they suck otherwise and cannot compete

Way to misread the point dumpshit. PEOPLE where denied education based on their social status and that included both men and women. The point is when women were given the same resources and education as men they still did creatively worse than men because they are mentally inferior.

a) It wasn't debunked
b) You just copy/pasted a word wall from the same misandrists who used an intentionally misandrist definition of rape for the sole purpose of dismissing female-on-male rape
c) Nothing in the copy/pasted text you dropped (which I doubt you even read) actually refutes the idea beyond basically pointing out that combining the statistics will lead to a margin of error. If the CDC wanted more accurate figures, they could do so, but they choose not to get them so estimates are the best we have and the best estimate is 40% of rapists being women.

If you or the CDC have a better estimate that INCLUDES women who rape men (something that misandrists like yourself and the feminists who run the CDC won't do) let me have it. Until then, 40% is the most accurate statistic we have.

we have VI powered gynoids

but we don't have labour robots!

retard

Because you can't read or comprehend text here is an easier summary for you.

The claim that "40% of rapists are women" based on the CDC’s National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) is incorrect and based on a flawed misinterpretation of the data. Here's a breakdown of why that 40% figure is wrong, according to the CDC's detailed response:

1. Mismatched Definitions
2. Mixing Timeframes (12-Month vs. Lifetime Data)
The 40% figure improperly mixes:
12-month victim estimates (recent experiences of sexual violence) with lifetime perpetrator data (who committed it ever in life)
3. Invalid Mathematical Logic
The 40% figure is calculated by multiplying:
The estimated % of male victims in the past 12 months
By the % of those men who said their perpetrators were female (over their lifetime)

But this multiplication does not yield a percentage of all rapists:
It lacks a clear denominator (total number of perpetrators) and assumes every victim has one perpetrator, which is false.
4. One Victim ≠ One Perpetrator
5. The Sample Represents Victims, Not Perpetrators
6. Underestimates and Missing Data
Victims from groups with small sample sizes (not statistically reliable), and non-reported or ambiguous cases, further skewing results.

The "40% of rapists are women" claim:
Distorts definitions (rape vs. being made to penetrate),
Combines mismatched data (12-month vs. lifetime),
Uses invalid math (multiplying unrelated stats),
And ignores how the data was collected (victim-focused, not perpetrator-focused).

Conclusion: That number is not supported by the CDC's data and reflects a fundamental misinterpretation of how to read and apply the NISVS results.

Cismen world would be rape and murder, no man wants to there

You literally didn't even read it. You copied it from someone who copied it from someone who got an email from a misandrist organization which is intentionally dishonest specifically because they want to downplay female-on-male rape.

You also didn't even read my comment because you're an actual NPC who can't think for yourself and is only capable of copy/pasting large chunks of text and hoping that proves anything.

If you or the CDC have a better estimate that INCLUDES women who rape men (something that misandrists like yourself and the feminists who run the CDC won't do) let me have it. Until then, 40% is the most accurate statistic we have.

still no reply because neither you nor the misandrists you copy/paste from have an answer and you know it. 40% isn't perfect but it is 100x more accurate than the 98% that feminists always cite.

No, men were not denied education and forbid of practicing professions because of their sex, unlike women. Rich men are still men, powerful men were still men

Men make 90% all rapes. Look for stats from antifeminist countries and it is still true

The labour robots would still have to be maintained.produced and improved. Men would do that themselves. Women would allocate that part of the labour to some grand Ai at which point their existence would become...well worthless to be honest. Men only world is a world were men want to do shit and build upon things. Women only world is a world where women want to just fuck off in the woods and piss,shit,fuck without a care in the world like the underdeveloped fearl animal they truly are whilst giving absolute power of their existence to some Ai which may or may not decide that it wants them around anymore. The nature of a woman is to be subservient to someone or something else so she doesn't have to do her own surviving. Whether tha be men or godlike Ai's makes no difference to her.

You can't debunk a single point from the list. You're literally that fucking dumb.

And the fact that you can only link ONE STUDY from 2010 (where the source of the study even debunked that claim itself) proves that you're full of shit.
List 10 other studies from anywhere that confirm that women commit 40% of rapes. Go ahead, we wait. Should be easy if this was a consistent trend.

Women can absolutely work and maintain things when men aren't around and they have to. It has been seen in war over and over again, when almost all men died or disappeared or got drafted.

They don't LIKE doing it, but they can.
Even you would go into the woman only world unless you're gay and would really miss Daddy cock or something. Just stop the cap.

Women can do that, all eastern world has shit ton of women into tech and coding

I'm illiterate, I don't understand statistics, and I'm incapable f logic or critical thinking.

see I notice man-hating feminists like you never correct statistics like this Even though the 40% that I cited is far more accurate than their stats (which intentionally exclude female-on-male rape)

It's almost like the real problem is that you just hate men and think that a woman forcing a man to have sex shouldn't be considered rape. But you don't want to admit that so you nipick over minor imperfections with my stat (which is the most accurate stat we have) and ignore the people citing statistics which completely omit female-on-male rape entirely.

And the fact that you can only link ONE STUDY from 2010 (where the source of the study even debunked that claim itself) proves that you're full of shit.
List 10 other studies from anywhere that confirm that women commit 40% of rapes. Go ahead, we wait. Should be easy if this was a consistent trend.

Go and post the other studies.
There are many non-feminists countries that don't favor women so it should be easy.

If you or the CDC have a better estimate that INCLUDES women who rape men (something that misandrists like yourself and the feminists who run the CDC won't do) let me have it. Until then, 40% is the most accurate statistic we have.

Ok so you admit defeat. You literally as your source of women being 40% of rapists only can quote ONE study from 2010 (lmao) that has been misinterpreted.

I accept your concession, faggot.

>If you or the CDC have a better estimate that INCLUDES women who rape men (something that misandrists like yourself and the feminists who run the CDC won't do) let me have it. Until then, 40% is the most accurate statistic we have.

women can do stuff when they have to

Everyone can do stuff when they have to

but they don't LIKE it

And that is why they will opt to create Ai automated systems to run their society in place of men manking their existence worthless by their own hands. Because by the end of the day we agree on the same principle. Women don't want to do ANYTHING else other that piss,shit and fuck like feral animals. Hell they don't even want to do reproduction until it is too late and they realise that they are genetic failures that removed themselves from the genepool.

I would hypothesize that a significant portion of women who call themselves lesbian actually arent at all and this is whats causing the divorces and bed death
most of the problems lesbian relationships seem to have stem from misandrist or sexually traumatized straight girls becoming political lesbians

Hey, you still have a chance to support your argument with data and studies instead of sperging out and looking like an insane sissy who got caught lying.

Everyone can do stuff when they have to

Yes, glad we agree.

And that is why they will opt to create Ai automated systems to run their society in place of men

Implying most men love working hard. They would also shuffle shit off to AI.

Women do cute things with other girls in girl only world. Men fight and murder in male only world

You are correct, the 40% is the most accurate study that anybody can find on the subject

Thanks for admitting you were wrong and that my 40% figure is the most accurate statistic we have.

muh ONE study

yes this information started becoming widespread after 2010. You couldn't refute it then just like you can't refute it now and any modern study would just have the same figures with slight differences.

Anyway now that you have admitted that the 40% statistic, while imperfect, is the most accurate one you have ever been able to find and is also more accurate than anything the CDC can point to, I guess this convo is over. Another win for anti-feminists.

You are correct, the 40% is the most accurate study that anybody can find on the subject

Absolutely not. I've already pointed out various things that are flawed about the study and you were unable to debunk even a single one. Furthermore, it makes no sense to make a statement about the world based on ONE study from 2010 with a small sample size even IF this study was somehow not flawed. You can't explain that.

yes this information started becoming widespread after 2010.

Ok, link other studies that confirm this data or trend before or after 2010.
From any country, there's many non-feminists countries.
Go.

Me: Here's some data. It's not perfect because misandrists control the data and they won't let us get better data

Feminists: But your data isn't PERFECT! Do you have any PERFECT data?

No, but it's better than anything else

But it's not PERFECT HAHAHAHAH GOTCHA!

Okay well do you have anything better?

No, but can you show me a PERFECT study that took place in the last 3 years since I'm a Zoomer who was in preschool in 2010?

No, but again, I have shown you the best statistics we have. Can you show me anything better?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH YOUR DATA ISN"T PERFECT THAT MEANS MY COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY WRONG DATA IS BETTER!!!!

most logical feminist

all eastern world has shit ton of women into tech and coding

Which would be the baseline for sustaining such a hypothetical society. Does it have women in manufacturing? Working sewage systems? Construction? Mining? Farming?
The answer is a resounding no. All those fields that are integral to our modern society are predominantly if not nearly exclusively worked by men because those jobs are icky to women. So in this scenario women would try to develop Ai's and automation systems that work themselves into those fields. And that point they would just get tired of coding and create Ai's that codes themselves removing themselves altogether from any kind of labour. Because women do not want to work. They are inherently anti labour. They want to cry about their feefees and live like feral animals. God damn I can't wait to bring witch burnings back that shit was dope.

why don't YOU cite a study then? I asked you multiple times but you didn't because you're a shitty troll who just keeps wasting my time.

My data > Your data
Objective fact and one which you cannot refute. Either show me a better study that INCLUDES female-on-male rape or you lose.

The real world is not your cutesy autistic yuri animu and by the way reality itself works it can never be. Men live in the real world whether they like it or not. Women live in their own make believe land where they are all independent boss babes and Wonder Women.

It's not perfect because misandrists control the data and they won't let us get better data

You can't claim that every country in the world is controlled by misandrists though, so this makes no sense.

No, but it's better than anything else

Explain to us why your 2010 data that has been debunked is better than anything else in the world.
Again, there's many countries that do not follow WESTERN FEMINISM and have statistics/studies/research.
Therefor, it should be extremely easy for you to find studies or insight that states that women indeed commit 40% of rapes.

(around 5-6% if I recall)

It's even less than that. It's less than 1%. Feminists think 5% of men have raped a women but that means at minimum 7.5 million women in American alone have been raped? It's fucking absurd and zero evidence supports such a large number of victims.

What feminists do is they group "unwanted flirting" or "I felt bad afterwards but gave consent" as literal rape in their survey statistics. That's where the CDC came up with their bullshit "1/6 women have been raped".

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8300987
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10839233
oneinfourusa.org/statistics.html
asia-pacificresearch.com/sexual-violence-gender-inequality-japan/5631818

Including places that aren't feminist.
Can you find one study from anywhere (India, Korea, Japan, Iran, Mexico) that supports the 40% of rapes are committed by women claim?

gay men win again

They can't keep getting away with it

The non-feminist countries are tradcon countries that also think men can't be raped by women. There are zero countries run by egalitarians.
Again, if that 40% stat is so bad, then it should be easy for you to find a better one that INCLUDES female-on-male rape.

But you can't because the 40% is the most accurate figure we have even if it's not perfect it's far better than any other stats you would cite. So you lose, I accept your concession

2010

2010

2010

2010

I hate Zoomers so much it's unreal

2010 was 45 years ago.