Post your nuclear hot takes on trans

post your nuclear hot takes on trans

I acknowledge three types of transgenderism: mental illness (dysmorphia), fetish (autogynephilia), and a social construction/contamination (femboys, etc).
I'm fine with all of this and think they're all perfectly valid states of being/existence.
I say this in the capacity that WESTERN SOCIETY has already very clearly established several cultural societal standards: we don't incinerate retards, we have freedom of religion/thought (and the freedom to be protected from other's religion/thoughts), and what consenting adults do in the bedroom is between them, so to me this entire exchange has always been a thinly veiled backtracking of morals/ethics. Everyone was fine with cutting their dick off and imaginary pronouns when it was for Judaism. Everyone was fine with bending over backwards for people with Alzheimer's, schizophrenia, autism, etc.. We even elected a president with dementia, but somehow none of this is relevant for trannies.

My second nuclear take is that looking normal and/or being pretty is, "unfortunately", the only thing that will legitimize the belief/practice of transgenders, femboys, autogynos, in the public's eye. You cannot be ugly. You *have* to be presentable. You HAVE to take care of yourself. This is the mutual reality we both have to live with.
Let me make it clear that nobody expects you to be a model; nobody is measuring the length of your fingers, the distance of your shoulders to your waist, or the shape of your head, but you absolutely cannot exist as a man in a summer dress.