Sure thing, here's my take on it. I'm MtF.
I like todo this thing when interacting with people who want me to admit I'm a man somehow or another where I'm like "Okay, is your definition of a man just someone with XY chromosomes and that's the only defining feature?"
If yes, then okay, w/e, I'll say it: "I'm a man."
But then if that's your definition, I don't want to hear anything about how I should "act like a man" or "am dangerous" or "should be/are naturally masculine acting" or anything like that.
Usually people want their to have their cake and eat it too I think with these definitions.
They want the definition of man and woman to just be chromosomes or whatever, but also want man and woman to correspond to all the assumptions we make about men and women simultaneously.
If you were to say to me "you're of the same nature of me, distinct from the nature of all women, because we are both men." I'd have to disagree with you heavily, because that's just not the case.
I think functionally, most people don't actually use "man" and "woman" to mean nothing other than the chromosomes someone has. Usually it's loaded to the brim with associations we have related to gender. And if I'm going to be associated with one grouping of those behavioral associations or the other, it'd be the woman one.
Like, I'm perfectly okay saying "I'm a male woman" for instance, under this way of defining terms.
IDK, I think it's all blown out of proportion.
"I'm a man with boobs and a srs vagina lulz"
or
"I'm a male woman lulz"
It's accurate, no?
if you have some better way of putting it, go ahead.