If you're fembrained you're anti-MAGA

Reminder that Gen Z women despise Trump.
Only 1 in 4 of them like him and I'm sure all of those are rural southern trad wives trying to please their boyfriend who beats them or something
If you're under the age of 30 and and fembrained, you're anti-MAGA

Caring about politics outside of virtue signalling on social media is malebrained

It's more about the fact that the populist right is genuinely stupid than anything else. That's why you should hate them.

Reminds me a bit of this one where young women are now less religious than young men.
The average gen z foid is a theyfab

stuff that doesn't affect me personally is "divisive identity politics"

stuff that directly benefits me at the expense of others is "good old common horse sense"

oops! your skin color is showing

Im white jewish femboy and nazi.

These are especially funny to me because gen z women are much smarter than gen z men, and it's reflected in statistics like amount of women in academic fields vs men

Literally every ethnicity supports policies that benefit them disproportionately. There are Pakistani politicians in the UK making their entire careers about Gaza, sex segregation, and how we need to build airports in fucking Mirpur. Black politicians talk about how the government needs to implement programs to tell everyone how wonderful black people are. I don't think white people going "can't we all just not talk about race and get along :)" is much worse.

black people want there to be government programs to promote being respectful to black people and for there to be a "black history month" where kids learn about frederick douglass

white people want there to be government programs to deprive everyone else of their rights and due process and have the deported to a giant gulag in el salvador

whoa, I literally can't tell the difference!

who are you quoting?

gen z women are much smarter than gen z men

I don't get it. Like I get it but it seems like the issues with the education system favoring women impacted milennials too, or at least zilennials

this is a trvth nuke

and that's why men hate it. They don't have tradwives anymore, and women realize they're better off without them. This explains the societal propaganda we're seeing lately. The evangalization of young men, especially online.

Matter of fact is that the current conservative swing among men is making them dumber and less likely to pursue higher levels of education, which also impacts their overall intelligence. There is no good role model of healthy masculinity, and in turn, Republicans and conservatives are filling that vacuum. Toxic masculinity has been peddled royally throughout the internet and media, and almost always supplemented with misinformation, pseudo-intellectualism or anti-intellectualism. People like Shapiro, Tate and Peterson certainly didn't help, and then there's people like Joe Rogan just kinda regurgitating their narratives, without being fully immersed into the same views. The "boys will be boys" attitude among these men is discouraging men from taking responsibilities for their views and actions, which is also significantly contributing to the pseudo/anti-intellectualism attitude, because it discourages them from weighing their own actions and consequences. It's a shit show that both Republicans and Democrats have shaped together.

How about himbo figures like Hasan?
I.e. dumb chad guy gets the babes

discouraging men from taking responsibilities for their views and actions, which is also significantly contributing to the pseudo/anti-intellectualism attitude, because it discourages them from weighing their own actions and consequences

why do you always say something like this about men but never about women

Matter of fact is that the current conservative swing among men is making them dumber and less likely to pursue higher levels of education

I think there's more to it.
As a mtf I got graded waaaaaaay easier in school as a passoid than a manlet. I think women massively benefit in school/academia because people grade women easier on subjective assignments (i.e. essays, projects) and then they also have more social support. Like I know this cis couple, both trying to get into grad school. The bf did all her homework and she used the extra time to pad her application in other ways and got into a way better school. Then also interviews for grad school/jobs helped by being a foid too

ok but i am a millennial you fat fucking idiot

I am the 55%

I'm literally a centre-left "liberal" turbo-normie politically. If you are more radical or more conservative than me you don't pass, please remember that.

A fair question. Because toxic masculinity is being pushed way harder by media than toxic femininity. Men are encouraged to act like men, and women aren't encouraged to act like women. In fact, they're shamed for their toxic behavior.
Orrr maybe you being comfortable in your skin gave you increased clarity and confidence. And your anecdotal example means nothing when there's still plenty of discrimination, as well as idealization towards both men and women all over. None of my old classmates never got preferential treatment for their gender. If someone said something dumb, the teachers would always burn that to the ground.

Their anecdote is still more valuable than equivocation. If men discriminated against women for 100s of years, why do we assume that nowadays the genders face the exact same amounts of discrimination and that the inverse (men being discriminated against) isn't even a possibility? Something as simple as women's only scholarships suggest it isn't a perfect balance.

First off, who is "we"? I never said I believe the discrimination is equally distributed. Only provided a counter-anecdotal experience.
Second, have you looked at IQ numbers lately? Ever since the millennial generation, the average IQ score has been decreasing instead of increasing as it always has.
Third, I wholeheartedly believe there is a correlation between the conservative swing among men and their intelligence. Because conservatism partially crumbles under actual knowledge. Republicans know this, so they consciously peddle misinformation and anti-intellectualism, and encourage men to partake in that through appealing to their masculinity. Which is, again, done by filling the vacuum created by a lack of example of positive masculinity. I'm not saying men aren't discriminated against, they most definitely can be and will be depending on the place and setting.

If you want more than an anecdote check this out. Seems to be a consistent finding in the US, boys get better test scores but girls get better gpas.

I'll just say in terms of essays. Pre-transition it was like I'd turn in a paper and the teacher would mark it up to hell and find every little fault and give me a D.
Post transition it was like turn in a paper with a bunch of faults (which I knew I was sloppy because of that previous harsh grading from many teachers across many years) and then get an A. Again across many years and class and subjects.

This one's really interesting.
61% of those scoring in the top decile of SAT scores are boys.
However, in the top decile of GPAs it's 61% women.
Maybe math grading is more subjective than it appears.

im a eurohon nonny

Thread like these make me want to troon out like holy shit fuck being a man nobody cares for you
Fuck this world

You said absolutely fucking nothing. Continue with your retarded xitter spittle though; as if progressives don't also have near-identical issues with misinformation and pseudo-intellectualism. You barely giving any credence to the shitty aspects of the left already shows us who you are. The "boys will be boys" attitude is as much of an issue in magnitude for trans people as the social virtue-singling attitudes of transgenderism advocacy is. Is it this difficult for all of you to imagine how the medical and social markets treat the transgender people negatively in the guise of support? Or are you going to continue taking copius amounts of narratives from masturbation and identity politics while you're being taken advantage of by capital? Seriously. The sheer amount of participation in the political diatribe profusely bleeds inbetween your words. Next you're probably going to describe sucking the shriveled boomerdick attached to the socialist critiques of modernity as if capital and AI will be turned on its head in 2025.

as if progressives don't also have near-identical issues with misinformation and pseudo-intellectualism.

Never claimed they don't, but misinformation and pseudo-intellectualism are foundations on which modern conservatism are built.

You barely giving any credence to the shitty aspects of the left already shows us who you are

Guess you conveniently overlooked the part where I'm also blaming Democrats for creating the vacuum that is lack of exemplary healthy masculinity.

transgenderism

"Transgenderism" doesn't exist. Being transgender is not an ideology.

Is it this difficult for all of you to imagine how the medical and social markets treat the transgender people negatively in the guise of support?

Not really no. That's a real thing.

Or are you going to continue taking copius amounts of narratives from masturbation and identity politics while you're being taken advantage of by capital?

Identity politics are a strong driving force for both sides of the political spectrum, like it or not.

The sheer amount of participation in the political diatribe profusely bleeds inbetween your words

Yep. Republicans suck. Conservatism sucks. Democrats suck too. In fact, most of the US political landscape sucks. Deal with it.

Next you're probably going to describe sucking the shriveled boomerdick attached to the socialist critiques of modernity as if capital and AI will be turned on its head in 2025.

We can embrace change yet critique it. Must be hard for you to grasp. Are you done making assumptions?

>You barely giving any credence to the shitty aspects of the left already shows us who you are

Guess you conveniently overlooked the part where I'm also blaming Democrats for creating the vacuum that is lack of exemplary healthy masculinity.

No, I didn't. Keyword: barely. It should make sense for me to have made the assumption that you were part of political normiedom. You made it sound like you weren't gathering a bigger and nuanced picture of what is happening.

We can embrace change yet critique it. Must be hard for you to grasp.

I honestly have no problem with people critiquing something in the name of a different system to no end. If you get enough context into the different empirical perspectives of how capitalism emerged, how it has intelligently captured human desire into consumerism, how it produced the most efficient economy to date, through psychological tactics, through incessant integration, through taking advantage of close connections, etc. etc. then you should be able to see how a lot of critiques against it become utterly semantic and enveloped in a lunacy of a takeover. A lot of people here needlessly throw their fists against a brick wall, and who knows, maybe stronger bones will create a hole. We'll see how it works.

It should make sense for me to have made the assumption that you were part of political normiedom. You made it sound like you weren't gathering a bigger and nuanced picture of what is happening.

Fair, a lot of my views are 'normie', yet I always feel like I'm the odd one out. I don't really feel like I belong in either political camps, because I'm too critical of both of them. I have my gripes with both ends of the political spectrum, but my greater gripes are with conservatism, which is why I identify as moderate left. I think Democrats suck, but Republicans aren't the answer.

Contrary to what a lot of people like to believe when they see me write, I'm not really pro-socialist either. I think it has its upsides. But in practice, it has the potential to put people in great suffering and can be just as oppressive as any other unhinged economic system. I think capitalism is a fine system for larger populations, as long as it's regulated and it empowers the working class. Which brings me to my main gripe of the current Republican party: they are powering abusive corporations and rich oligarchs instead of workers, and are getting away with it by shifting blame onto vulnerable minorities. I'm not saying we should obsess over minorities, DEI, etc.. I think we should instead grab these people by the collar and ask them what is up with them taking away money and power from the poor and lower class, while giving big corpo and insanely wealthy people even more money. And I firmly believe that controlling what men see as masculinity fits in the picture here, because it allows them to gain more control while Democrats stare and yell that men are bad and we need to be more inclusive and yadda yadda yadda. Quite painful to watch.

One more anecdote.