Men - people with prostate glands

men - people with prostate glands
women - people without prostate glands

joe biden is about to become a woman

that's what he has always wanted

Til some women with cah can develop a full on prostate
Thanks for making me curious i guess

yet more proof that creating an actual definition of woman that includes all "biological females" and excludes everyone else is impossible

adult humans who mostly lack y chromosomes in non-blood cells

then we can say biological males can get pregnant which is stupid and makes the categorization not needed in the first place

i mean yeah if they are an extremely rare one in ten million intersex variant and even then only if you construct an artificial womb and there's only one recorded case of it ever happening - unless you count chimeras who are arguably not biologically male or female

A woman is an adult human who refers to herself as she/her, presents feminine and has fairer characteristics, is under the effect of estrogen, may get pregnant if ovaries are present, has a social role commonly agreed as non masculine most of the time, tends to be looked at as the definition of beauty, and hasn't received SRS if born with a penis

this is a retarded metric for a definition lmao

presents feminine

weasel words
what you mean is crossdresses in public
trannies consider public crossdressers the opposite sex, but won't outright state this

mostly

great definition
how is it a retarded metric for a definition meant to exclude trans people to not allow for exceptions? that's the whole fucking point

I mean you can set some arbitrary parameter like 80 or 90% but people whose cells are averaging anything like 60% + non-y are gonna look pretty female in almost every instance
whereas trannies look male so including them as women is stupid

The definition of chair is meant to exclude non chairs but you can't give a definitions that includes all chairs and excludes all non chairs, that's not how words work retard

which proves that definitions are all made up abstract concepts and therefore trying to exclude trans women from women as a group is retarded and impossible. you bumbling faggot

trying to exclude men from women

is logical unless you believe females are a privilege class and you want to force your way into that group

btfo'd. sneed

how is including millions of men who crossdress more logical than including one single male with a rare intersex disorder who managed to become pregnant with someone else's egg with surgical intervention?

are you fucking retarded? Trees are a made up concept, even botanically. just because something is an invented concepts does not mean it does not map onto some existent thing in the universe. you sound like a fucking child who heard someone talk about social constructs once. Like most retard transexuals. by your logic all language is useless and retarded because all language relies on the use of invented concepts. never speak again you retard

Trans men on T often develop prostate tissue

I think anyone who needs a definition beyond vagina and xx is kinda autistic

lowkey…

the full gland?

this is exactly my point. actually kill yourself

you are a retard

t. male

why

joe biden's cornpop was a bad dude.

cornpop?

Someone born with ovaries.
Your gender abolition nonsense will not catch on. Even if you want society to adopt a trans-inclusionary definition of woman, you must still present a definition of woman that excludes cis-men and trans-men.

Males of which species? How do you define pregnant? Is now a good time to mention seahorses, or...?

seahorses are horses because they have horse in the name

Someone born with ovaries

which necessarily excludes some cis women. actual retard

Your gender abolition nonsense will not catch on

i do not want to abolish gender. i enjoy it when people classify me as a woman. my point is that it's all vibe based abstract categories that are fuzzy around the edges and there will never be a hard definition that will exclude me while not also excluding some cis women. if most people think i am a woman and i think i am a woman then i am a woman.

which necessarily excludes some cis women.

What is a cis woman and how am I excluding some of them?

i do not want to abolish gender. i enjoy it when people classify me as a woman

If you can't present a definition of woman that you think society should use, that is de facto gender abolitionism. If men can pay women's sports, and men can go to women's prisons, and men can receive women's scholarships, etc, then it doesn't mean anything to be classified as a woman.

my point is that it's all vibe based abstract categories that are fuzzy around the edges and there will never be a hard definition that will exclude me while not also excluding some cis women

Again, what is a cis woman? If you can define cis woman, then wouldn't that definition meet your conditions of excluding you but including all cis women? And if you can't define cis woman, then how can you say my definition excludes some of them?

I stand by that a woman is a person born with ovaries.

I want to abolish gender.

you're the kind of redditor who spergs out about tomatoes being fruits while everybody thinks of them as, uses them as and calls them vegetables

Not an argument.

Women have skenes gland which is extremely similar though
No only some tissue

yet undebatably true. btfo

tomatoes are fruits

trvke