Sex and gender are two different concepts chud

sex and gender are two different concepts chud

NOOO NOT LIKE THAT!!

I've been pretty consistent about wanting to abolish both.

Yeah, I feel like this is one of those weird inconsistencies that leftists didn't wanna talk about. Like, you're telling me gender=/=sex, ok. But that means that a person with a "female" GENDER needs the right to change their SEX on I.D.'s? It's not logically consistent, and I believe these gaps in logic (plus a refusal to address them) are a big part of why the Democrats are losing the public on the tranny issue.

1655539910087.jpg - 736x601, 305.77K

abolish sex

we can't abolish dna doe

There's literally no reason that sex should be recorded on government documents.

This statement would sound unhinged to like 90% of normies. I agree with you, but like...you know that, right?

it needs to be changed bc retards like you will see my id and do a double take at the m and treat me like shit and discriminate against me. fucking retards stop pretending like you’re using logic you inbred. literally look at picrel and tell me how that’s going to make her life better or easier, or is it going to make it easier for everyone else to shit on her 24/7
i wish you’d all fucking suffocate on your own self inflated righteousness. ego driven shitholes pressing on the necks of those you’ve placed below you to distract from your own disgust at needing everything fucking handed to you. KILL YOURSELF FAGGOT

I'm aware. I'm also aware that normies love government overreach.

I'm not even trans, I just find it a pointless thing to keep a record of.

Well, then they shouldn't list it as "sex" on the ID. Trans activists have spent the better part of the last decade stressing that gender and sex are different, usually with the implication that gender is the changeable one. Whatever the consensus is on this board, the common understanding is still that gender is the changeable thing, sex isn't. So when you say that you want to change your officially listed sex, too, many people will look at you and say

oh, so you want to lie to people

I've been saying for years that trannies, once they have acclimated the public to gender changing, will pivot and start trying to claim sex is changeable too. Essentially, they will try to redefine the dictionary until you have no words left to explain how they aren't the same thing as a natal woman. I expect them to try and steal the term "natal" next ("um acscstually womb conditions blah blah").
It won't work. Most people still believe that a trans woman and a cis woman are not the same thing, at all. You can't shame or gaslight them into compliance. The best you could hope for is a good compromise, where they learn to accept you a little more, but you're not screaming TWIW until they agree.

my id says my sex is "x"

will always feel real good and sleep like a baby lamb in baby jesus manger knowing i am legally more valid as a tranny under the eye of the law than hi(M)

yes..

goodnight anons..

x.jpg - 82x23, 1.32K

it's called a sex change operation and not a gender change one. Silly cissies

ummm sweetie i think you mean "gender affirmation surgery"

I believe these gaps in logic are a big part of why the Democrats are losing the public

gaps in logic have never lost a political party the public on any issue. most people dont really care one way or the other its just right wing gender obsessives like matt walsh who get hung up on stuff like this

no the sex change operation is a sub group of gender affirming care.
If you get boob implants as a cis woman that is also gender affirming care.
It's the same umbrella bullshit like transgender which includes transsexuals but also transvestites.

this shit adds more confusion. "License and registration pls" "you dont look a man, get out the car, ma'am".

Was gonna call you a retard but
is fair, I think.

I would say the public does want answers on what they feel like are pretty basic questions. When the only responses they get are leftist walls of text about gene expression and fringe intersex cases, they tune out.

the common understanding is still that gender is the changeable thing, sex isn't

facts and logic fag here, gender is a lot more changeable, but sex doesn't get an easy pass either (since hrt sure does affect a lot of sex shit, including the ability to produce your AGAB gametes or do many of the other AGAB things we connect with sex; hell I wouldn't be surprised if it messes with some gene expression too, but I'm too lazy to look for studies on that)

Actually, thinking about it, you're not wrong. Why is sex recorded on government documents? I mean, I'm a self-confessed transphobe and even I don't get this.

Well, good luck abolishing that now. They want to be able to easily identify the troons. Libertarian ideology seems to be dying.

nta but I'll put on my tinfoil hat for shits and giggles:
bongs don't even have id, which is the one impressively uncucked thing in an otherwise absolutely cucked land
they used to record religion in swamp germany, so when the germans rolled in, they had ready-made lists of all da j00s
now we have sex on our documents, which idgaf personally as a cis straggot, but I can see it going pretty fucky for the 1% of the population that has some sex development shit so they're e.g. intersex, or trans (subcategory of intersex) or other shit, and them getting to live a normal life kind of depends on not having a golden star on their id, depending on what people they need to interact with

For all intents and purposes gender is what is really perceived by others on the day to day basis and should probably be what everything but relevant medical records identifies someone as. And of course medical records should include then whether or not the individual is on HRT (this+weight more important than birth sex assignment for most common medical purposes ex medication dosing).

And yes I am 100% saying that societal perception is the most important thing. Other things have value but they still don't matter near as much. "Skirt go spinny" and insanely AGP public behavior or identities centered around the treatment of women as sex objects that you want to become do a lot to disqualify you as a woman. If a trans man has a high voice and shoves their boobs in my face and actively sexualizes their female characteristics they are really just a woman. Etc etc. Maybe we see this change over time but this is what mostly matters and I'm tired of seeing how many people pretend that this isn't the case. Instead of seeking societal acceptance trannies and allies are full force "if you don't want to see a dick in the women's locker room you're a bigot and I'm being oppressed".

you dont look a man, get out the car, ma'am

lol, hell of an imagination you got there

We're transsexuals you moron. The reason we use 'transgender' is because
1) Breeders are too dumb to understand that transsexual is about physical sex and not intercourse.
2) The other groups under the transgender umbrella worry we might do unto them as the gays did unto us (aka jettison them from our coalition and only fight for our rights since those are an easier sell). Calling ourselves transgender is a sop to the rest of the coalition.

Yes, now you're getting it.
On the one hand, "legal sex" is weaponized against trannies through gatekeeping and shit. Worrying about what happens when some government purge starts brewing.
On the other hand, "legal sex" is weaponized against TERFs. If the government legally recognizes someone's sex, then by extension it needs to then go-to-bat for that person. Otherwise the government's authority over such matters starts to be questioned. So if the government says this person is a women, then you are in legal shit for refusing her.
So we end up with this tug-of-war over the levers of power. Both sides want to control the institutions around sex and use it to destroy the other.
And all this is happening over what? The government wanting to produce some charts of "number of males and number of females in each age cohort"? Even shit like the draft in the US, you could just require everyone to report to a registration office at 18, and then rate every based on their fitness (with "women" and "fatties" ending up in a lower priority queue).
I'm a tranny and I support mutual disarmament. The government has no role in arbitrating whether someone is "male" or "female." It's a social matter and us trannies and TERFs can argue about it in civil society, rather than in front of a government body.

Sex is a powerful description of a person, why wouldn’t it be required?

sucks for transgender ppl i guess.. transsexuals stay winning

You do realize that they were called transSEXUAL before they were ever called transGENDER, right? What is with this retarded larp. Also, in Texas you need SRS to legally change your sex. Legal sex change in Texas is done as an amendment to one's birth certificate. This has been the process for decades. Legally speaking, woman in OP pic is of the female sex.

So is height, but my drivers license doesn't have 6'2 on it.

sex is a powerful description of a person

to largely socially ill effect, in a lot of contexts

Height doesn’t always stay the same

Mine does, my weight also.

Yeah, this
Having gender and sex parameters on an ID would be the only way out

its for identification, thats it. thats the official "real" reason

For all intents and purposes gender is what is really perceived by others on the day to day basis and should probably be what everything but relevant medical records identifies someone as.

based, also surprisingly in line with sex marker being used to identify people :)

btw we allow legal sex change because of human rights like right to privacy, in many places its been won through courts and its all based on it

as a person with no penis who looks like a woman I'm sure putting male on my documents will help identify me...

Are you post-op?

yes

It definitely helps law to understand that you are a male then. If you put “female” on your identification, and law or government officials talk to you and immediately know you aren’t actually a woman, that female identification is going to really throw them off since you clearly aren’t what your id says. Why lie about your sex

height and weight are on drivers licenses in every state and country because its a very important identifying factor.

has no penis

looks like a woman

sounds like a woman

female identification is going to really throw them off

no it's not
fun story motivated by all the nonsense last week I tried to use the men's bathroom and all I got was a bunch of men yelling at me to get out

yeah kayla take a picture of you pissing and farting and shitting in a gross public restroom that seems like a good idea

You think they won’t know you’re a tranny as soon as you start talking to them?

last week I tried to use the men's bathroom and all I got was a bunch of men yelling at me to get out

that doesn't happen to cis women or people shooting up heroin so it makes me wonder what the fuck you were doing to manage it

until some cissie reports you the authorities for fraud because they saw your penis through the cracks in the stall of the bathroom.
suddenly you're under arrest for defrauded the federal government and social security for desisting transition.

Not in my country. Maybe over there in Burgerland, but in the rest of the world we have photos.

That's the goal.

To the right sex, you mean.

Go fuck yourself

all the way or no way. the whole reason they didn't put them with women was because they kept their dick.
basically, non-ops are male. dick = male.

Sure, I'm in favour of making SRS very accessible, glad to see we're on the same page, also non-ops should go to female prisons, but only for an actual crime, not for driving on a licence that the government deliberately made impossible.

Read the actual articles

the whole reason

Also, even tranners with SRS go to male prisons in England. The point is to maximise misery and death

With good reason, let's be fair.

Well done, one person does something bad, so everyone loses their rights.

Let's take away your human rights since the demographic you belong to did something bad

Yes.

Why do want to have no human rights

I don't. I want (You) to have no human rights.

Then you're a fool. Because they won't stop at 0.5% of the population. The goal is everyone that isn't super rich to live in misery

That includes you. You're too stupid and hateful to realise. You're life is already a wreck

seething about dog raping pedophiles being sent to men's prisons

muh human rights

Rope.

a full body photo?

a face is not enough for an identification to be made absolutely.

You're so stupid, you want the chain around your neck. You want to live like an animal because you project your own failures onto some imaginary other.

You'll probably get your wish, since the billionaires in charge hate you so much. Lucky for you, you're too dumb to realise why we have human rights in the first place

Trannies don't deserve human rights.

get new material

would MTF / FTM delineation be an acceptable compromise?