Genuinely, how much is she responsible for the bad rep trannies get?

genuinely, how much is she responsible for the bad rep trannies get?

Imagine JK Rowing getting mating pressed by a big trans dick

rape correcting TERFs will never work

most people who like her books dont even know shes transphobic and the ones that do either dont care because theyre normal people or they laugh at her because shes a demented old lady sniffin black mold daily and writing shit on twitter

trannies are responsible for their own bad rep

I‘m out of touch with how much normies care for someone like that, but I can imagine with radical transphobes it‘s like with radical feminists, they sort of live in their own bubble. „Trans people are mentally ill and delusional“ is much more common transphobia than „trans people are misogynistic and rapists“. The normie knows trans people aren‘t actually a danger to them, they‘re just freaks to gawk at.

She still malding over her ex husband fucking a troon

She did more good for trannies than bad. She brought back to life magical thinking without which there would be no 'Look at me! I am the little princess now'.

I forgot the cute Ghlibli pic.

2025

optics discourse

Boooh

I think maybe you don’t know what optics are. A rich and famous person spending time and money and using their platform to demonize a group isn’t simply about optics

She's just openly against things like changing the definition of woman to include trans and call biological women "people who menstruate". It's trans people's fault they went crazy on her.

Harry Potter universe is just a huge magnet for autistic people and manchildren who can't get over a fact that the creator of their favorite fantasy world doesn't follow the politically correct narrative in 100%.

most people i know who've voiced opinions think she's insane but still have a mixed or straight-up negative opinion of trannies due to how they sperg out over her
t. british

sure anon

People never lie and you should take their opinions at face value, intuitive people never use euphemisms to present their most controversial opinions in a socially aceptable way.

I dont know

1666505626771.jpg - 1135x1621, 887.58K

I choose to overexaggerate what someone says because they surely are just devils that want to spread hate

that totally doesn't sound delusional and paranoid

I don’t even think the average American knows JK Rowling is an interested in the trans issue or what her politics are at all.

So I’m going to say none. But some of the public hon misbehavior has given trans a bad rep and what people see as chid abuse (gender transition under 18) or the men in women’s sports issue. And it’s unlikely they either Rowling

Probably different in the UK where Rowling is involved with some of the politicians

are trannies lying about being women?

I love that there's basically only ONE famous person willing to stand up for gay people against trannies and she's extra hated for it.

IMO, the boomer white lady feminism that Rowling subscribes to, is essentially only "allowed" culture war issues to get mad about. I don't have sympathy for her, she's a wealthy boomer white lady, and is part of the problem, but she also lives in a country where if you criticize the group of people who were allowed into the country, and subsequently raped your daughter, you will be the one to get into trouble. People in the UK are fucked, they will seethe about trannies but now about the brown hordes of invaders currently destroying their country, or the neoliberal policies which hollowed the country out and turned it into a money laundering city state with some farmland attached. Rowling is a good example of how easy the lives of boomers was, she is wealthy and this is what she is allowed to get mad about. The rest of her countrymen (and us) have real problems, so we see her as frivolous. Boomers are so easily distracted, it's sickening.

She's standing up for the white lady, sex and the city boomer feminism which made her a multimillionaire. She implicitly admits through her ramblings that white women are a privileged class, especially if they have wealth, and she wants that status protected. Ironically she is a walking poster board for how most modern day feminism is bullshit, cis white women are at the top of the pyramid, second only to jews.

I disagree I think white women are fully at the top of the social pyramid.

they should be fully on top of my dick desu

I am 99% sure she is a lesbian. My impression from harry potter is that she only gave a fuck about the male characters and the female characters were written to all be thinly drawn and as unpleasant as possible maybe with the exception of Professor McGonagall (sp?)

I mean I don't think we're disagreeing here. IMO jews are at the top of the pyramid, those being a handful of wealthy male jews, female jews (sheryl sandberg), who rule through white women, who are easily manipulated into being made about things. I still think white women are the top of the social pyramid, just maybe the bottom portion of the apex. Trannies are near the bottom, unless they are Hunter Shafer level rich, and even then it's to push a narrative, and a later on rug pull.

whites are on top, that's the whole war is that whites are mad jews are #2 despite being so primitive evolutionarily
white/germans v jews has literally been the dominant tribal warfare mode for 100+ years now

how does sheryl sandberg rule anything? what does she even do besides being somewhat publicly known?

source: my ass

I can't imagine why you would be so invested in troons unless you are lesbian gay and find the concept of homophobic gays larping as straight personally repellant because its people on your team fighting for the other team.
I just assume she's basically angsty cuz she's a lesbo who married men and resents doing so and trannies are a continuation of comp het legacy that fucked up her personal life and made her be with abusive men she didn't even like, just to get kids.

I was talking about the Harry Potter thing. There were plenty of female characters with a lot of plot developed around them. You just watched the movies, which cut a lot of Hermonie subplots

There were plenty of female characters with a lot of plot developed around them

???
I read all the books at least 5 times except 6-7 cuz those were not as good.
Hermione was absurdly unlikable her traits were just being better in school at the others and being loud about being right and perfectionist I felt like she was a personalization of JK's own negative traits.

cho chang

moaning myrtle

also like none of the female slytherin characters get any details at all
I feel like she's mildly sympathetic @ the hufflepuff females for being too stupid to know better

Hagrid is the only true likable character in Harry Potter.

what are you on about?

how is her feminism different from modern feminism? before feminism was actually about being a woman on the same level as men, not like now where it's about a label to promote yourself as cool

before feminism was actually about being a woman on the same level as men

no it was trying to institutionalize misandry from the start
women WANT to be above men in the social hierarchy
mammals are matriarchal - all of them!

women control access to sex and rule on that basis

You're talking to an actual schizophrenic who's been spamming this board for over a year.

whites are on top, that's the whole war is that whites are mad jews are #2 despite being so primitive evolutionarily

white/germans v jews has literally been the dominant tribal warfare mode for 100+ years now

nigger what are you going on about here?

how does sheryl sandberg rule anything?

She was the COO of meta nigga
wrote a whole ass book on being a rich celebrity jew feminist
literal billionaire lmao

how is her feminism different from modern feminism?

Literally where did I say that? I said her brand of boomer white lady feminism is exactly on par with the dominant form of feminism in the West currently. She's a wealthy white boomer lady who wants to protect her privileged status in society, while simultaneously punching down on the one demographic of person who she's legally allowed to in the UK, trannies. She's ensconced by her wealth into thinking that they are the main problem in the UK, and not the hordes of brown subhumans who've been let into that country. She is a beneficiary of the economic system that has destroyed the UK.

you're an actual schizo if you have opinions that differ from neolib orthodoxy

is essentially only "allowed" culture war issues to get mad about

Trvth Nvke
tranny hate is kosher bigotry

Brits were the prime colonizers, they kinda deserve it anyway.

I'm just fascinated that from the topic about famous woman that has Twitter arguments with trans people, you went to the immigration. Is no other topic allowed? Are you even British to care as much?

People do not call bio women “people who menstruate.” That term is reserved for bio men who are female.

hey girl!

makes sure her eye sees the apple in my hand