If you're reading this you're probably an AGP (realistically speaking)

If you're reading this you're probably an AGP (realistically speaking)

If you're reading this you're probably a beautiful person with a compassionate heart.

If you're reading this and your feelings were hurt by OP, I love you and want you to be happy.

okay

If you're writing this post you probably don't realize it doesn't matter.

It matters to me

Even if that was a thing why do you fags keep framing getting a hard on from putting on a dress as "bad"

I'm afab with AAP.

anyone here auto gyne in their free time

because its weird and means you have like 0 female socialization probably
most of the time "agp" here means you dont have the same taste in men as gay guys do

What does shame have to do with it

that’s why transbian is my default guess on chart/picrew threads lol

its all autistics trooning out its always autism

Not true, I just saw this thread on the front page of Anon Babble.

not agp or hsts

Legit question that I'm genuinely curious about not trolling, I used to come to the board years ago and it was mostly gay stuff. Now I visited and this board is like 90-95% trans posting. When did that happen and what caused it?

that must have been a really long time ago if true

if im agp that means im winning

post yfw cobson hwnbag and sharty lost

Admittedly so, I remember the Anon Babble board being created. Been here that long

wrong , im just traumatized and i lacked a father figure in my life

so you're just a faggot trying to attract better tops?

I'm AAPAGP
I only like the idea of being a girl when it's through the lens of crossdressing being something that boys do

I am a cis man, not a pooner
gods most poonbrained cissoid

how do you deal with it

isn’t it statistically and not realistically? cuz y r there so many trannies who r into women compared to how many women r lesbians

Yes, but in order for Blanchard to make his AGP category so broad he had to expand the definition to the point of being meaningless, where trans women who don't fit a strict behavioural definition of the AGP fetish in the slightest still get categorized that way for being bi or gynephilic alone.

Sneed

There's lot of good research into AGP traits and it's a correlation with other factors among trans woman. the best indicator of being an AGP is actually attraction to other trans woman and "feminine man" as two discrete categories. also correlates positively with female attraction and negatively and male attraction

Yes, I understand that some gynephilic and bisexual trans women do fit a strict behavioural definition of AGP as a fetish, but that apparently wasn't enough for Blanchard who wanted HSTS and AGP to be a closed set without a third or fourth etiological category, and so I think he overly expanded the definition of AGP by making gynephilia or bisexuality itself automatically made a trans woman AGP if she individually doesn't have the actual strictly defined fetish.

Also, a priori asserting that any trans women categorized by Blanchard as AGP who says their own experiences don't fit his model as a liar who must always fit Blanchard's assertions takes his model out of the realm of science and into the realm of ideology.

It bugs me as a bisexual trans woman who doesn't fit any strict behavioural definition of AGP in the slightest and who likely has a different etiology to my being trans that Blanchard ignored wholesale in his model (I've had some sort of intersex hormone condition since puberty and I've spoken to a bunch of other trans women who fit my pattern but not either of Blanchard's categories).

Likes cis women ? good

I think he overly expanded the definition of AGP by making gynephilia or bisexuality itself automatically made a trans woman AGP if she individually doesn't have the actual strictly defined fetish

nobody overexpanded, imo his two types just describe too well two different clusters of transexuals it doesn't even matter if AGP was the only factor at play during the transition.

Also, a priori asserting that any trans women categorized by Blanchard as AGP who says their own experiences don't fit his model as a liar who must always fit Blanchard's assertions takes his model out of the realm of science and into the realm of ideology.

sexology or humanities aren't sciences, it all inevitably boils down to borderline unprovable ideas.
It's obvious almost all trannies know about his typology and feel strongly for it so it's not far-fetched at all to say interviewing or using questioners on trans people is not reliable and there has been meaningful research that had like 70% of trans people that took part of it deliberately requesting to comment on blanchard's theory even though it has never been directly mentioned or requested

Cis woman don't have anywhere nearly as much AGP, you're right it's a spectrum but read the research

i love me some transgender cartoon animals

good research

lol
you mean "research i agree with"? because Blanchard's work is barely above MBTI astrology shit in terms of quality and rigor

Like all troonology if we’re being frank here