is being far right inherently malebrained? i hope not.
Is being far right inherently malebrained? i hope not
yes+room temperature iq brained
of course it is
Depends, far right is a broad spectrum. Ancap and other right wing economic ideas are definitely male brained. Being racist is neutral I'd say, there are a lot of racist women.
obviously
Depends on the era
bootlicker-brained if nothing else
im not asking about the intellect of my ideals, im asking about if its inherently masculine or not
i adhere to national socialism if that helps to answer your question
Being far right on race and immigration is peak male. Being right wing on women's role is peak female.
You just want a transsexual tradwife
You recognize the truth of blood, but do not understand time or the sacred. Climb some mountains.
ok so you are in fact genuinely retarded, the first word is yes
Would she frot with me under a sundress in public?
Public sex doesn't seem very trad to me
It's extremely malebrained, it's about as malebrained as your main hobbies being squash and chess.
It's in a sundress and it's just some rubbing under a table or something. People will "know" but they won't know you know. Then I'll blast all over the table and move on. We will go to Mr.Chuds bar after and talk about the west.
yes, it is.
The actual biggest gender divide in politic isn't left-right (i.e. economics). The actual biggest divide is reproductive rights.
Meaning that an actual legit answer to OP's question would be that the most "fembrained" are the "men's rights activists" who madly obsess over the line "American men have NO reproductive rights".
yeah
Fembrained
like the strongman because he’s cool strong
like the progressives because social empathy consensus-building evo-psych competition shit
Malebrained
thinking about it deeply at all
i would be a tradwife if i could pass
modern politics is currently very testosterone vs estrogen, yes.
"bootlicking" is a submissive behavior, and a hallmark of the modern estrogen-leftist. as is projecting your internalized insecurities, such as being a submissive estro-leftist bootlicker.
there's a reason the nose tribe has been trying to pump everyone full of estrogen in the food and water supplies, along with convincing people to literally inject estrogen straight into themselves, and done nothing to curb the rampant spread of microplastics which are known to reduce testosterone. a submissive, female-brained leftist populace is far easier to manipulate and control, and even far easier to emotionally rile into targeted political violence should the need arise.
Estrogen is submissive and testosterone is retarded. Choosing between the two sucks ass.
there's a lot of trad, pro-white girls on twitter now, so I don't think so.
duhh the juice or something
Maybe in 2011 but now half of my cis women mutuals are far right. Whats male brained is shouting nigger nigger at random and other needlessly aggressive confrontation low level behaviors
no.
yes being right wing is inherently masculine since its vibes-based reactionary politics which is also extremely unintelligent
it's inherently anti-intellectual and anti-reality and you should be fucking ashamed
i dont see why i should be ashamed of wanting to secure a future for my race.
anti-intellectual
anti-reality
lol
the religious are the only ones reproducing at sufficient levels
it doesn't matter how smart you are or what you can say if any bumbling retard that's physically superior to you decides to just punch you in the face
failure to acknowledge the fundamentals is inherently is a kind of idiotism that commonly befalls the over educated
"Your race" does not exist. What Americans today call "race" is an erroneous idea that was imported from the old world in the early 1700s to keep American workers divided after the late 1600s American ruling class got scared of cross-strata working class rebellion.
is being a bad person malebrained?
i mean kinda
you have been brainwashed by jews, im not going to listen to your leftist retardation
The fact that the terms we use to refer to races are socially constructed and imperfect does not mean that the concept of race is illegitimate. Race is an extension of the concept of family or genetic lineage. People are genetically adaptive if they do right for their race because the race has many copies of the individual's genes.
wanting to secure a future for your race doesnt make you a bad person
fuck you
who gives a shit
leftoids hate you secretly
rightoids hate you openly
does it matter?
No just fucking troon out who gives a shit
trannies larping as brownshirts as if they weren't sent to the camps along with the fags kek
race isn't real. even if it were, why would u feel more kinship for rednecks who want to gas you than sisters in trannydom, whether they're white, black, or Thai, Indian, indigenous, etc. Trannydom is small enough as it is, why make it even smaller with ur racism?
this is very retarded lmao race is a very real biological concept wtf are you talking about
Maybe because they are literally kin.
just be a nazi.
max fem and max masc
if "race" is defined as the belief that skin pigmentation can be used accurately to discern ancestry, prognosis, and intelligence, then it is very much not a real concept lmao.
humans are incredibly young as a species, and any differences between "races" (whether skin pigmentation, presence or absene of epicanthal fold, or nasal bridge variations) are incredibly superficial and only arose as the consequence of disease prevention or sexual selection. even apparent "racial" diseases such as sickle cell are in fact not racial, but rather geographical in nature, and are present, to varying degrees, in all regions which have historically faced the risk of malaria, whether africa, arabia, or indomalaya.
any such regional variation in human characteristics, already being incredibly minor and nowhere near sufficient to justify speciation, will effectively cease to exist as we enter the age of global communication and transportation. and your oh so special white race, incompatible with a globalized world, will cease to exist alongside it. but your people, your culture, and your descendants will continue to exist, and they will revile your ideological myopia. do you truly desire to sever yourself so completely from the humanity which will succeed you?
if you truly love your kin, speak to them. it does not matter if you are from america, france, germany, the baltics, turkey. ask your elders what the nazis meant to them. ask them what hardships they had to endure under such a regime, born of fear and hatred. get off your chan boards and talk to people in your actual community.
I’m like Hispanic I’m just saying race is a very real biological concept. People are different just like any other form of biological life. We just use the term of race to separate them. Obviously we shouldn’t demean other people because they are of a different race but ignoring such biological reality does more harm than good.
No, they're probably not. Two people's ancestors both originating from the same continent does not indicate kinship. Continents are genetically diverse.
skin pigmentation is not an accurate approximation of regional variance among humans. the vast majority of genetic diversity among humans is located in africa.
"Race" =/= genetics.
Well it’s not only about skin pigmentation we are literally fucking different in so many ways I don’t understand why you can’t accept they are different
Then what is race to you?
I’m not going to argue anymore about this shit
so far right get accepted and welcomed into left circles. fml
just fml.
JUST FUCK MY SHIT UP
Can you visually tell apart a Nigerian tribesman and a Congolese tribesman? No? Well guess what, they have more genetic variation between them than a European does with a Saharan "black" person.
i agree there is genetic and cultural variation among humans, but defining such variations as differences in "race", defined as variation in skin pigmentation and facial features, is simply not accurate. as said previously, the vast majority of human genetic variation is among black africans, because homo sapiens evolved among black populations in eastern africa and lighter skin pigmentation was only a useful trait for the realtively small population which migrated north to asia and europe.
nta I can always tell
citation is another fucking chanboard lmfao. could you explain to me what the axes of "PC1" and "PC2" refer to? if not, this is the scientific equivalent of drawing yourself as the chad and your opponents as the basedjak. maybe try jstor next time.
you're just fucking retarded
idk what else to tell you, buddy
PC1 and PC2 can be anything
if you look at the bottom left corner, you get the same bullshit but with Oceanea. omg Islanders are tame wolfs being controlled by jews! and Africans are closer to Europeans than any other group! racists combine cherry-picking with leaping to conclusions
What’s your point anyways? I didn’t read the thread I just like posting that particular piece of bait because sometimes you get a genealogist to schizobabble for an hour and it’s kinda funny
i actually don't believe anything it was all a joke haha
you can't take an L
no I’m actually not sure what the conversation was about. The first post I read was the one you wrote about two different tribesmen, so I got no idea what the context was to begin with :P
Please stop being retarded. The earliest writings on race go far back as Artistotle
the one you wrote about two different tribesmen
that wasn't me
the longer you're wrong about something, the more right you are!
1.) What? That's not what race is at all. Race is just human sub-species. Call them populations, genetic clusters, or races: humanity is unequivocally divided into phenotypic/genetic groups.
2.) Irrelevant point, and phenotypic differences like skin color to "nasal bridges" warrant taxonomically significance. What you just said is that race is real, but then proceed to downplay the weight of phenotypic differences.
3.) No one said anything about speciation, and "species" is not the end all be all. Genetic variation is continuous. And as a question, do you know how natural selection works? I don't think you understand how "geography" drives race differences.
4.) My people and my descendants are my race, and they're existence is under threat by anti-white marxist abombinations.
5.) Stop pretending to be retarded. My ancestors are Klan members and confederates while also being patriots who fought in ww2. Do you think the Nazis invented racial nationalism or something? How do you think the world saw race in 1940 or are that dense to think critically?
Lol, so it doesn't mean anything to you people. Race deniers will play games about the definition of race while race realists give clearcut and affirmative answers.
being a retarded gay race communist = dumb silly puppy brain girl wife arf arf (˶˃⤙˂˶)
become omega passoid, take the Chinese century pill and worship supreme leader Mao Zedong (˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶)
????
He said that race was "invented" in the 1600s, you know, at the beginning of the scientific revolution and European exploration, my retort was that isn't the case because the ancient greeks and romans had rudimentary race realism. Please follow the logic before you waste my time.
Modern leftists are the most socially sensitive, conformist people out there. Maybe communists aren't? But liberals certainly are the biggest status quo, establishment shills.
It's threads like this that remind me why I love being a normal liberal and not a fucking lunatic.
Do you mean liberal as in an individualist or liberal as in cut off your balls and kill whitey?
”normal” liberals when liberaling
as in picrel. Karl Popper believed that abandoning enlightenment principles to instead embrace Hegel and culture wars drove both the right and the left insane.
too sleepy to keep arguing, just do the world a favor and kys
omg ur so silly :D
"I'm too stupid for nuanced science-backed answers so I still believe pseudoscience from 100 years ago."
How many fucking times do we have to explain that race is not an effective shorthand for genetic variance?