Chud with a question

I would call IVF the 90's decentralized usenet of biotechnology. We're nowhere near Facebook/Tiktok equivalent levels of biotechnology.

Mostly eugenics taken to the extreme, resulting in undue stratification of society.

Psychosocially. Say a reasonably competent and unbiased psychologist would look at this person and say "this person is healthier, stronger and more alive than when I saw them 2 years ago, and it's not because of something else in their life changing."

That's a big deal too

unbiased psychologist

No such thing

Theoretical definitions are still a useful guide for intuition.

My point is that to say someone is living a "better" life presumes an entire moral framework.

At that point you could argue the same for any and all life changing decisions

Yeah?

Wait, I may have misunderstood, we were you saying that to refute the definition?