so it's not a reputable source. It's an article published by a hate group as propaganda
just from reading the image it's clearly not written in good faith. "Most clinicians" have all sorts of opinions about stuff that they know nothing about. If you were trans, you'd know the value of the opinions of "most clinicians". It's not scientific, and it's using weasel words to try to frame a narrative.
As an intersex person I believe trans and interse rights are inherently linked
What is a credible source?
a credible source is a peer reviewed scientific publication, like a journal. A credible source should be backed up by strong evidence, and should either have no bias or the bias clearly stated. A book can also be a credible source, if it's from a trustworthy author and uses credible sources for its claims.
Now what
INTERSEX INTERSECTIONALITY IS BASED. MANY TRANS PEOPLE ARE INTERSEX AS WELL. YOU ARE TOTALLY RIGHT AND BASED WE SHOULD BE FRIENDS.
INTERSEX ALSO HAVE A PLACE WITHIN THE BROADER LGBTQIA+ SPHERE AS WELL BECAUSE MANY OF THE BIGOTED POLICY AND CULTURAL NORMS THAT NEGATIVELY AFFECT LGBT PEOPLE ALSO AFFECT I PEOPLE.
based on the abstracts they're just random authors trying to take the most precise definition of intersex possible. The first one denies that klinefelter's or turner's are intersex conditions, which is not the scientific or public consensus nowadays.
If I was born with fucked up dysfunctional genitals that didn't develop properly, I personally would like to get them repaired for free. Instead of having to wait 18 years then spend up to six figures out of pocket to do so.
klinefelter's and turner’s are barely intersex. Acknowledging them as intersex is probably transphobic somehow, but I’m too high to do a tumblr prose take
I don't even want to dignify you with a proper response.
you should kill yourself
0.018% figure
counts people with Klinefelter's, i.e. male with two X chromosomes and one Y chromosome as totally not intersex in any way bro
I think that bullshit definition to arrive at 0.018% was created for ideological reasons, the same reason you've decided to cite it instead of more reasonable definitions.