what exactly is radical feminism and is it preferable and less destructive than trans ideology to introduce children to
What exactly is radical feminism and is it preferable and less destructive than trans ideology to introduce children to
Idk mainstream 'trans ideology' is probably more nonsensical than radical feminism, but radical feminism is pretty batshit insane with all the misandry, weird religious beliefs and interest in destroying the family.
misandry
their goal is to cause pain to men
Does anyone even know any more?
does anyone have more info on OP pic? it screams sweden to me, also
all them women oogling the reaction of the boys
loll
All ideology is destructive. The powers that be aren't have systems in place to subvert and corrupt all movements to maintain the status quo via setting the working class on itself.
There's a reason feminism went from being an equality movement that sort equal rights for women and placed femininity as equal to masculinity to a sexist movement that insists that femininity is lesser than masculinity and that women are no different from men rather than equal. It's why it's a schizophrenic mentally ill melting pot of self-loathing misogyny, unabashed misandry and deranged spiritualistic nonsensery like pic related.
It is no coincidence that the first feminists were wives and their successors were auto-misogynist political lesbians with rape fantasies.
Yes, radical in a political sense is derived the latin radix i.e root - politics are radical insofar as the identify a single element as superior and causative of all others. To quote Marx because its provides probably the clearest example: "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." This is radical (anti-)classism, it identifies class as the superior element to which all other elements are inferior and 'determined in the last instance' by. Radical feminism specifically arose from within, and as a critique of, Marxism - specifically they challenged the primacy of class at the level of anthropology since something prefiguring gender based casteism existed in pre-class social formations. The radfem retort to Marxism became: "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of gender struggles." since gender qua social caste predates economic class. The radfems were arguably correct on this point but this is only really a factoid, Marxism has a lot more moving parts that identify why class is the prime mover and radical feminism couldn't pose sufficient challenge or alternative explanatory power. Radical feminism was snuffed out pretty quickly, mainly by Marxists since that was the discourse it arose in, and it isn't a position that anyone today actually holds seriously (except maybe the handful of aged academics that spawned it). TERFs, for instance, wouldn't try to explain racism as a subordinate process of gender, they wouldn't try to explain labour disputes, the transition from feudalism to capitalism etc. etc, because they aren't actually radicals.
Of course radicalism in normie political discourse just means 'more extreme' than the political centre which i suppose is true but this is idiotic cretinism.
radical feminism affects everyone it is exposed to. Being flashed by elderly political lesbians is unhealthy for girls and boys, and the ideology of radical feminists is meant to be learned by girls and boys
it is much less unhealthy to offer free estrogen to 13 year old boys who want to be girls, as only a fraction of a percentage of the population will end up being affected.
political lesbians don't exist, you are just homophobic
holy based
What's the context of this? It's a Dutch thing right?
The kid that looks so disinterested is killing me he really just wants to be doing something else
a majority of women are functionally bi and go through a phase when they hate men
political lesbians definitely do exist
its such a mood
I don’t blame him it’s a fat old lady. Not a hot super model naked.
mainstream 'trans ideology' is probably more nonsensical than radical feminism
anyone wants to compare the insanity between these two things?
Let's compare and see what happens if each ideology took over the world:
Radical Feminism:
Pros: Nothing
Cons: Women are in full control. Men are blamed for everything. Porn & prostitution is illegal. Ugly & short men are sent to death camp.
Transgender Ideology:
Pros: People are free to customise themselves. You can get a trans gf.
Cons: Words are now meaningless. You can't point out any logical inconsistency in the gender nonsense.
The latter is the lesser evil, thank you very much.
castration is actually customization
there's different kinds. seems like marxist femininsm is pretty based because they're really just marxists armed with a correct analysis of gender.
all forms of feminism are veiled misandry
Cons: Words are now meaningless. You can't point out any logical inconsistency in the gender nonsense.
You can't point out any logical inconsistency in the **ANYTHING**. Because logic has died. All kinds of slippery slope will happen and nothing with stop them.
multiple typos, go read between the lines
too lazy to correct them
Feminist ideas are almost all good, but feminists themselves are often deranged freaks
i prefer the forms where misandry is the conclusion and not the premise, and conditional on the real role men have in making the world shitty. also you don't have to read it as hatred as a man, it's critique, and you need critique to better yourself.
logical inconsistency in the gender nonsense
genuinly curious, what are they ?
The only idea feminism has is that men are evil and inherently deserve punishment for their sex.
women have penises but ur gay for wanting to suck said penises
women have penises but ur gay for wanting to suck said penises
who said that ? Clearly not transfolks
lmfa this photo is absolutely hilarious, every person expression, everything is perfect.
Very hard to find information about it, look like it's some Estonian performance american rightoids found a photo of and did their usual moral outcry about.
you're retarded
Can you link me the feminist literature that says that?
Women are dangerous in general, they defy logic, ignore technical details, evidence against their ideas, and even public opinion. You could solve their entire life after they destroy it and then immediately do the exact same thing they did, just to see if this time it works.
I have a hard time putting it into words, I genuinely don't understand why they do that, but I am beginning to think they are simply self-destructive.
I have a hard time putting it into words
you're just misogynistic
women's behavior causes misogyny
that's something a misogynist would say
maybe get to know women more ?
...no, I'll give an example, I live in an area where power outages are common, this woman I know cannot live without AC or some sort of fan, every single time, she asks me if it is a good idea to buy a fuel powered generator, "just a small one for her room", she wants to put a monoxide pumping machine inside her room and her only worry is how is she going to keep it on if it runs out of gas.
some people are dumb regardless of the gender they identify as
Well it could be but I know many women that insist on similar stuff, lactose intolerance, alcohol poisoning, putting themselves in danger in general, they don't follow logic.
Feminism itself is radical idk why idiots try distinguishing between it all just because one camp is “meaner” and ups the absurdity to 11. It’s like saying
The prejudiced racists
HSTS versus AGP
One of those kids is gonna be gay and the others gonna develop a milf fetish
well in the case you mentionned, her reasoning kind of make sense, it's just a matter of priority. If you prioritize short term comfort over long term health benefits you'd probably get to the same conclusions as her
in general some people have different priorities than others, and some prefer to follow their gut feeling more than logic (like Trump for exemple, a man)
I have lost count how many times I have told her that it's not only dangerous, if she does that she will die of monoxide poisoning, but then she brings up her own cherrypicked examples "but this business had one in the middle of the room and no one died", and refuses to listen anything I say, then, she tells me something like "but I was planning on placing outside" as if I hadn't heard she just told me she wanted to have it in her room or that she argued with me about that.